Interpreting the past radiocarbon dating dating rituals germany in the 1990s

MYTH #2 Radiocarbon dating has established the date of some organic materials (e.g., some peat deposits) to be well in excess of 50,000 years, thus rendering a recent creation (6 to 10 thousand years ago) impossible.

In an earlier article for this Forum I discuss the scientific theory of radiocarbon dating and illustrate how it is a fallible scientific process, ridden with problems. In the early 1990s Marius S Ziolkowski, a Professor in Archaeology at Warsaw University, set out to bring together and catalogue a Radiocarbon Database for Bolivia Ecuador and Peru.These two measures of time will only be the same if all of the assumptions which go into the conventional radiocarbon dating technique are valid.Comparison of ancient, historically dated artifacts (from Egypt, for example) with their radiocarbon dates has revealed that radiocarbon years and calendar years are not the same even for the last 5,000 calendar years.For periods without a historic record, attempts have been made to categorize tool kits, pottery styles, and architectural forms into regional timelines.Some ill-fated attempts to define time even attempted to count backwards through the genealogies of the Bible, establishing a series of dates which remain a cause of confusion.In 1994 he and his colleagues published a 604-page document listing and discussing their results.Today it is very hard book to track down which is a shame as it is a first class piece of scholarly work and remains the authoritative publication in this area.Also, the imaginary ink in water slowly disappears with a half-life of 5,730 years. If you could watch 100 carbon-14 atoms (or red ink molecules which, in this analogy, represents carbon-14), you would on rare occasions see a carbon-14 atom decay and become nitrogen-14.After 5,730 years, half (or 50 carbon-14 atoms) would remain.They brand such accounts as myth, racist propaganda and story telling, not grounding for dating stone.Archaeologists draw their conclusions about ancient sites from the evidence they accrue from controlled excavations.